Thanks, I Read Some Articles ... - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Thanks, I Read Some Articles ...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by William Cao on June 20, 2003 01:39:12 UTC

I read the following papers:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0305021
http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0302095
http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0304345

The issue is that the articles have their own theories explaining experiment results without considering fundamental issues. I have some explanations on these matters, but I need to think more. Any other papers you would like to recommend?

Follow Ups:

If you are interested in gravitation... - bruce - June 20, 2003 - 02:45 UTC
- Thanks Bruce... - william_cao - June 20, 2003 - 11:19 UTC
  - William - bruce - June 20, 2003 - 20:12 UTC
    - Bruce - william_cao - June 21, 2003 - 21:31 UTC
      - Its because you... - bruce - June 21, 2003 - 22:44 UTC
        
        Bruce - william_cao - June 22, 2003 - 00:45 UTC
        
        You need to study GR... - bruce - June 22, 2003 - 01:25 UTC
        
        I meant to suggest... - bruce - June 22, 2003 - 01:30 UTC
        
        I read GR many times... - william_cao - June 22, 2003 - 13:17 UTC
        
        Two PHD... - bruce - June 22, 2003 - 20:32 UTC
        
        Well, I will try to answer... - william_cao - June 22, 2003 - 22:28 UTC
        
        The orbit is a function of two things.. - bruce - June 22, 2003 - 23:45 UTC
        
        OK...I was mowing the lawn... - bruce - June 23, 2003 - 00:15 UTC
        
        It left out.... - bruce - June 23, 2003 - 00:17 UTC
        
        NO... - william_cao - June 23, 2003 - 11:13 UTC
        
        NO.. - william_cao - June 23, 2003 - 11:55 UTC
        
        No.. - bruce - June 23, 2003 - 23:52 UTC
        
        Define r_rest - william_cao - June 22, 2003 - 13:31 UTC
        
        No - bruce - June 22, 2003 - 20:11 UTC
        
        Try to explain r_rest - william_cao - June 22, 2003 - 22:40 UTC
        
        Bruce... - william_cao - June 22, 2003 - 13:50 UTC
- Bruce, Please read this. I forgot to tell you... - william_cao - June 20, 2003 - 18:14 UTC
  - God and Science question for William Cao - carefuluniverse - June 21, 2003 - 04:40 UTC
    - Thanks, Mike ... - william_cao - June 21, 2003 - 12:46 UTC
      - Your statements speak for themselves - carefuluniverse - June 21, 2003 - 15:43 UTC
        
        Neither you nor bruce have any ethical obligation - carefuluniverse - June 21, 2003 - 15:48 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins