That is what he would say except that it is the improper use of a good word. Mike does not spam me because he is not offering anything for sale.

What Mike is doing is simply slander.

The title of the text in question is
"God is subject to mathematics and physics"

In the text I explain that even if the most abstract aspect of god created math and physics, the lessor levels of the godhead are subject to the laws of math and physics, although they may understand them enough to bend the rules.

Nowhere did I equate myself to god except to say that the evolution of the soul is pointed toward god as an ideal.

Mike claims that I am equating myself to god. He is doing so because he cannot refute the truth and honesty of what I actually wrote.

• but there is a high error rate in his text - carefuluniverse - May 16, 2003 - 16:52 UTC
  • Nice spin Mike - yaniru - May 16, 2003 - 23:20 UTC
    • Nothing - harvey1 - May 17, 2003 - 00:37 UTC
      • Harv -- are you a defender of good character - carefuluniverse - May 17, 2003 - 00:48 UTC