Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Nice Spin Mike

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on May 16, 2003 23:20:46 UTC

You should be a politician. They like to twist things around.

Here is what I said in context:

". But my faith in something like a god or fate that seems to control my life with an uncanny set of coincidences is based on the patterns that I read into those experiences. So my godlike faith may be an abstraction of my consciousness"

In no way can an honest person construe this to be equating myself with god. But then you are not honest.

Regarding what he claims is a rewrite, I actually said that twice, 'that god may have created math and physics but is now subject to it'. Three times if you include my title.

Harv asked him to sddress that statement. It is the central thesis of my post. But Mike does not have the ethics to address anything directly. EACH TIME HE AVOIDS THE THESIS. But that is just the Mike we all love to hate and hate to love.

Except Harv. Harv used to suggest the Mike was sick. What's up with Harv these days?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins