Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Do You Want To Get Aboard?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on April 11, 2003 02:39:01 UTC

Hi Tim
You wrote:
"Example Of Entropy And Communication"

Hi Tim:
There is no inherent tendency to dissipate
in our communication. Mind's energy consumption
does not appear to correlate with how
coherent or incoherent are Mind's communications.
If we distinguish between attacks upon person and attacks upon idea, we can do science.
Many folks here seem to have equated all-out
critical attacks upon their ideas, employing
logic with good ethical intent, to be the same
as attacking themselves. This makes science
too expensive. Fortunately, there is no need
to expend one's ego upon the defense of what
the same one has stated. Being able to learn,
we are better able to do so if we are able to
freely abandon any incoherent idea.
Cordially, etc.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins