Hmmm.... - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Hmmm....

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on October 19, 2002 20:00:23 UTC

"After all why include God in dating our history..."

How very selfish of you. If our dating system was "Before Muhammad" and "Anno Allah" you probably would be all for a new system. By virtue of your being Christian, you think everyone should think the same way. That's not fair.

Follow Ups:

Neither is taking God out. - emperor__alikar - October 20, 2002 - 01:56 UTC
- Gods dating is about 5637 - yaniru - October 20, 2002 - 03:42 UTC
  - Wow. - emperor__alikar - October 20, 2002 - 21:32 UTC
    - Wrong - yaniru - October 21, 2002 - 11:53 UTC
      - I said main. - emperor__alikar - October 22, 2002 - 01:32 UTC
  - The distortions of RyeKrisp Yaniru are worse than Paul's - carefuluniverse - October 20, 2002 - 21:45 UTC
    - Some content please - yaniru - October 21, 2002 - 11:54 UTC
      - http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/15693.shtml - quiet - October 21, 2002 - 14:34 UTC
        
        I do not apologize for making you vulgar - yaniru - October 21, 2002 - 16:37 UTC
        
        Are YOU the God of Moses? That explains a lot. Anyway... - carefuluniverse - October 21, 2002 - 20:58 UTC
        
        Please be quiet - yanniru - October 22, 2002 - 19:22 UTC
        
        That was a worthless post; you are a spammer indeed - carefuluniverse - October 22, 2002 - 22:35 UTC
        
        Here is SPAM - yaniru - October 23, 2002 - 14:07 UTC
To be honest - emperor__alikar - October 20, 2002 - 01:57 UTC
- You're still speaking from a religious basis - stormcrow - October 20, 2002 - 07:36 UTC
  - Well if he didn't exist - emperor__alikar - October 20, 2002 - 21:28 UTC
    - Okay - stormcrow - October 20, 2002 - 22:41 UTC
      - The American Age. - emperor__alikar - October 21, 2002 - 02:59 UTC
        
        It's a different world - stormcrow - October 21, 2002 - 05:31 UTC
        
        Why don't creationists date from creation - yaniru - October 21, 2002 - 11:57 UTC
        
        Most creationists only date other creationists (nt) - harvey1 - October 21, 2002 - 16:45 UTC
        
        LOL - stormcrow - October 21, 2002 - 17:05 UTC
        
        I'm in rapture - yaniru - October 23, 2002 - 14:10 UTC
        
        Answer: Because they don't believe in dating 4.5 billions years - harvey1 - October 21, 2002 - 17:20 UTC
        
        Answer: Eve was married - harvey1 - October 21, 2002 - 17:22 UTC
        
        Answer: Because there were not enough sheep to go around - harvey1 - October 21, 2002 - 17:26 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins