Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Get The Science Right

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on October 18, 2002 18:34:13 UTC

Dear Paul Moran,

Your science is a bit off. From your post:
***The big bang predicts that protons should decay***
This is not true. The prediction of proton decay comes from GUT theory. The prediction of the Big Bang comes from reversing the observed expansion of the universe. The Big Bang cannot predict anything. Only humans can.

Various theories predict a smooth transition from a previous universe to ours, principally string theories.

The observation of the CMBR-cosmic microwave backgroud radiation- indicates that the universe was once a thousand times smaller than it is today. Nothing else is known for sure.



Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins