God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| I Meant It
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Chris Duncan on October 2, 2002 05:09:21 UTC |
I meant to be vague and generalized. It is alright for a scientist to be inaccurate. But to be way off base tells us that this "scientist" didn't repeat the scientific process over and over again for the same experiment. That would this person experiments haphazarly and isn't a credit to the "scientific community". The "other scientists" would "weed him(or her) out". That is what I meant...If Einstein stated that 2E=MC^2, we wouldn't know who Einstein was...
|
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |