Who Are You? - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Who Are You?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Sam Patterson on September 30, 2002 18:05:55 UTC

You: "There are so many things wrong with your
argument that it's almost cruel of you to
keep badgering us with it.

1) The cars do have common ancestors. The genetic information of cars is not carried via
sexual reproduction, but is the basis of each generation of design. So your point proves
its opposite...IF YOU WOULD JUST FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THE THOUGHT!

2) We KNOW that sexual reproduction in animals
DOES create new combinations of DNA which gradually can change the average form of any genetic line. Mutations alone are not the only cause of genetic change!

At this point, it should be clear that
no Creationist should have ANY worldly authority over folks who are more honest and more evolved."

Point 1. So you are saying a Porsche and a beetle have a common ancestor, and it 'evolved' through car design to their models? Uh-huh. What would this original design be?

Point 2. Ok, but does it add new genetic information? If not, this is nothing. If so, tell me about it. Sounds interesting.

I'm not even sure what your last sentence means. I'll just assume it is a poorly worded insult.

Sam, KC2GWX

Follow Ups:

Response...and I have posted a resume' -- have you? - something - September 30, 2002 - 19:13 UTC
- Micro vs. Macro. - kc2gwx - October 1, 2002 - 05:32 UTC
  - Wait a second - harvey1 - October 1, 2002 - 15:44 UTC
    - One second is up... - kc2gwx - October 1, 2002 - 20:53 UTC
      - Nope - harvey1 - October 1, 2002 - 21:12 UTC
        
        Okay, I peeked - harvey1 - October 1, 2002 - 21:24 UTC
        
        Posted a little content there, H! - something - October 1, 2002 - 22:22 UTC
        
        Why bother? - harvey1 - October 1, 2002 - 22:25 UTC
        
        Yes; I do not even know if I'm on the internet or a local LAN - something - October 1, 2002 - 22:33 UTC
        
        If.... - fasteddy - October 2, 2002 - 20:45 UTC
        
        How often does that happen? :) - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 21:23 UTC
        
        yes :) - fasteddy - October 2, 2002 - 21:39 UTC
    - Who says it was salt water? - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:17 UTC
      - Nonsense - harvey1 - October 2, 2002 - 16:02 UTC
        
        A bit of "Nonsense": Video clip: Doctor Who - jisbond - October 3, 2002 - 01:40 UTC
      - Who Says: "The Sandman" - jisbond - October 3, 2002 - 01:34 UTC
  - Creationism is a wasted of time - neither Godly nor Scientific - something - October 1, 2002 - 17:16 UTC
    - Creationism is a waste of time -- neither Godly nor Scientific - something - October 1, 2002 - 17:17 UTC
      - ??? - kc2gwx - October 1, 2002 - 20:57 UTC
        
        "What did Mike mean," you ask? - something - October 1, 2002 - 21:07 UTC
      - 13 - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:25 UTC
        
        353 - something - October 2, 2002 - 02:22 UTC
        
        Ouch! - fasteddy - October 2, 2002 - 21:12 UTC
        
        This tells an interesting story with questions - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 21:39 UTC
        
        "when" diversity increases in the fossil record (nt) - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 21:40 UTC
        
        Good question! - quiet - October 3, 2002 - 02:32 UTC
        
        whoa! - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 18:24 UTC
        
        The reason for multiple screen names - harvey1 - October 4, 2002 - 19:51 UTC
        
        oooh, I get it! - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 21:59 UTC
        
        If you believe Harv on that, you are not doing science - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 22:39 UTC
        
        That's correct - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:59 UTC
        
        Hi Harv, Chris, et al - quiet - October 5, 2002 - 02:41 UTC
        
        Finally - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 13:14 UTC
        
        That "finally" remark is quite an innuendo - quiet - October 6, 2002 - 01:52 UTC
        
        Is that how you really feel? (nt) - harvey1 - October 6, 2002 - 15:45 UTC
        
        What do you really mean by that? (nt) - carefuluniverse - October 7, 2002 - 03:32 UTC
        
        I only go by one screen name (nt) - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:59 UTC
        
        Where did everyone go? - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 22:08 UTC
        
        On that note... - kc2gwx - October 5, 2002 - 04:18 UTC
        
        Sorry - fasteddy - October 6, 2002 - 03:06 UTC
        
        Not so...and not scientific either...That's a crock, Harv - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 22:38 UTC
        
        Would you tell me? - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 23:18 UTC
        
        I wasn't speaking for you - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:54 UTC
        
        If you ask WHY, I will tell you..at greater length than needed? - quiet - October 5, 2002 - 02:55 UTC
        
        Ethics - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 13:17 UTC
        
        Good question! We could use Scriptures with dinosaurs accounted - quiet - October 3, 2002 - 02:34 UTC
        
        You forgot the 483... - richard - October 3, 2002 - 18:43 UTC
        
        I don't even know why I argue.... - kc2gwx - October 4, 2002 - 15:19 UTC
        
        0: the number of acutal points that you have made against mine. - emperor__alikar - October 4, 2002 - 03:03 UTC
        
        I do tend to write in waves...which are made of points - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 17:56 UTC
        
        har har (nt) - emperor__alikar - October 6, 2002 - 02:06 UTC
    - Wow. - kc2gwx - October 1, 2002 - 20:54 UTC
      - You're welcome. You are also invited to 'Get to know yourself.' - something - October 1, 2002 - 21:04 UTC
    - 11... 12... - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:23 UTC
      - by supporting information, we assume you mean hot links - something - October 2, 2002 - 02:49 UTC
  - Your way of quoting my post almost makes it look like your post - something - October 1, 2002 - 18:44 UTC
    - Thanks "Rich." (nt) - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:27 UTC
      - I have signed my name "Mike" in some of today's posts - something - October 2, 2002 - 02:53 UTC
        
        nope - emperor__alikar - October 4, 2002 - 17:34 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins