Sam quoted:
"Think about a Porsche and Volkswagen ‘Beetle’ car. They both have air-cooled, flat, horizontally-opposed, 4-cylinder engines in the rear, independent suspension, two doors, boot (trunk) in the front, and many other similarities (‘homologies’). Why do these two very different cars have so many similarities? Because they had the same designer! What if human and chimp DNA was even 96% homologous? What would that mean? Would it mean that humans could have ‘evolved’ from a common ancestor with chimps? Not at all! "


There are so many things wrong with your
argument that it's almost cruel of you to
keep badgering us with it.

1) The cars do have common ancestors. The genetic information of cars is not carried via
sexual reproduction, but is the basis of each generation of design. So your point proves
its opposite...IF YOU WOULD JUST FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THE THOUGHT!

2) We KNOW that sexual reproduction in animals
DOES create new combinations of DNA which gradually can change the average form of any genetic line. Mutations alone are not the only cause of genetic change!

At this point, it should be clear that
no Creationist should have ANY worldly authority over folks who are more honest and more evolved.

• Who are you? - kc2gwx - September 30, 2002 - 18:05 UTC
  • Response...and I have posted a resume' -- have you? - something - September 30, 2002 - 19:13 UTC
    • Micro vs. Macro. - kc2gwx - October 1, 2002 - 05:32 UTC
      • Wait a second - harvey1 - October 1, 2002 - 15:44 UTC
        • One second is up... - kc2gwx - October 1, 2002 - 20:53 UTC
          • Nope - harvey1 - October 1, 2002 - 21:12 UTC
            • Okay, I peeked - harvey1 - October 1, 2002 - 21:24 UTC
            • Posted a little content there, H! - something - October 1, 2002 - 22:22 UTC
              • Why bother? - harvey1 - October 1, 2002 - 22:25 UTC
                • Yes; I do not even know if I'm on the internet or a local LAN - something - October 1, 2002 - 22:33 UTC
                  • If.... - fasteddy - October 2, 2002 - 20:45 UTC
                    • How often does that happen? :) - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 21:23 UTC
                      • yes :) - fasteddy - October 2, 2002 - 21:39 UTC
        • Who says it was salt water? - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:17 UTC
          • Nonsense - harvey1 - October 2, 2002 - 16:02 UTC
            • A bit of "Nonsense": Video clip: Doctor Who - jisbond - October 3, 2002 - 01:40 UTC
          • Who Says: "The Sandman" - jisbond - October 3, 2002 - 01:34 UTC
      • Creationism is a wasted of time - neither Godly nor Scientific - something - October 1, 2002 - 17:16 UTC
        • Creationism is a waste of time -- neither Godly nor Scientific - something - October 1, 2002 - 17:17 UTC
          • ??? - kc2gwx - October 1, 2002 - 20:57 UTC
            • "What did Mike mean," you ask? - something - October 1, 2002 - 21:07 UTC
          • 13 - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:25 UTC
            • 353 - something - October 2, 2002 - 02:22 UTC
              • Ouch! - fasteddy - October 2, 2002 - 21:12 UTC
                • This tells an interesting story with questions - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 21:39 UTC
                • "when" diversity increases in the fossil record (nt) - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 21:40 UTC
                • Good question! - quiet - October 3, 2002 - 02:32 UTC
                  • whoa! - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 18:24 UTC
                    • The reason for multiple screen names - harvey1 - October 4, 2002 - 19:51 UTC
                      • oooh, I get it! - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 21:59 UTC
                        • If you believe Harv on that, you are not doing science - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 22:39 UTC
                          • That's correct - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:59 UTC
                            • Hi Harv, Chris, et al - quiet - October 5, 2002 - 02:41 UTC
                              • Finally - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 13:14 UTC
                                • That "finally" remark is quite an innuendo - quiet - October 6, 2002 - 01:52 UTC
                                  • Is that how you really feel? (nt) - harvey1 - October 6, 2002 - 15:45 UTC
                                    • What do you really mean by that? (nt) - carefuluniverse - October 7, 2002 - 03:32 UTC
                        • I only go by one screen name (nt) - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:59 UTC
                      • Where did everyone go? - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 22:08 UTC
                        • On that note... - kc2gwx - October 5, 2002 - 04:18 UTC
                          • Sorry - fasteddy - October 6, 2002 - 03:06 UTC
                      • Not so...and not scientific either...That's a crock, Harv - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 22:38 UTC
                        • Would you tell me? - fasteddy - October 4, 2002 - 23:18 UTC
                        • I wasn't speaking for you - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 01:54 UTC
                          • If you ask WHY, I will tell you..at greater length than needed? - quiet - October 5, 2002 - 02:55 UTC
                            • Ethics - harvey1 - October 5, 2002 - 13:17 UTC
                • Good question! We could use Scriptures with dinosaurs accounted - quiet - October 3, 2002 - 02:34 UTC
              • You forgot the 483... - richard - October 3, 2002 - 18:43 UTC
                • I don't even know why I argue.... - kc2gwx - October 4, 2002 - 15:19 UTC
              • 0: the number of acutal points that you have made against mine. - emperor__alikar - October 4, 2002 - 03:03 UTC
                • I do tend to write in waves...which are made of points - carefuluniverse - October 4, 2002 - 17:56 UTC
                  • har har (nt) - emperor__alikar - October 6, 2002 - 02:06 UTC
        • Wow. - kc2gwx - October 1, 2002 - 20:54 UTC
          • You're welcome. You are also invited to 'Get to know yourself.' - something - October 1, 2002 - 21:04 UTC
        • 11... 12... - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:23 UTC
          • by supporting information, we assume you mean hot links - something - October 2, 2002 - 02:49 UTC
      • Your way of quoting my post almost makes it look like your post - something - October 1, 2002 - 18:44 UTC
        • Thanks "Rich." (nt) - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:27 UTC
          • I have signed my name "Mike" in some of today's posts - something - October 2, 2002 - 02:53 UTC
            • nope - emperor__alikar - October 4, 2002 - 17:34 UTC
• Hi are you Richard? - emperor__alikar - September 30, 2002 - 21:40 UTC
  • You are not honest. That is simply a fact. - something - September 30, 2002 - 23:08 UTC
    • Hope that I am bot the Richard you refer to - yanniru - October 1, 2002 - 12:19 UTC
      • btw wrt the question imho :) - something - October 1, 2002 - 17:05 UTC
        • So that is were the anger comes from... - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 01:04 UTC
          • SamAaron, You're not making me angry. - something - October 2, 2002 - 03:16 UTC
            • Webmaster -- the above post responded to his implied question - something - October 2, 2002 - 03:31 UTC
            • It sure sounds like it! - kc2gwx - October 2, 2002 - 11:49 UTC
              • Wrong wrong wrong...without knowing it then - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 16:04 UTC
        • Just wanted to correct you.... - kc2gwx - October 2, 2002 - 11:01 UTC
          • Yes, you did that yesterday and I answered you - quiet - October 2, 2002 - 16:08 UTC
      • I wish you would have attached that to the post you replied to - something - October 1, 2002 - 17:08 UTC
      • MJutations are neither positive nor negative 'til time proves it - something - October 1, 2002 - 17:13 UTC
        • Example: "MJutations" did not confuse anyone...typo tho' it was - something - October 1, 2002 - 18:39 UTC
      • If you put it that way... - emperor__alikar - October 2, 2002 - 00:50 UTC