God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| The Difference Between DD And Physics
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Aurino Souza on September 19, 2002 14:25:10 UTC |
The basic difference is that we can use physics to do a lot of useful stuff, while Dick's paper can only be used to make much ado about nothing. The way physicists think may be logically unjustified, but they have been able to do a lot thinking that way. The way Dick thinks may be logically perfect, but you can't achieve anything thinking that way. Dick himself hasn't achieved nothing other than making much ado about nothing - there isn't a single equation in his paper that is either new or correct.
|
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |