Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
He Doesn't Say That

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alan on September 20, 2002 12:16:55 UTC

Dr. Dick is on record as noting that his work may resolve certain "paradoxes" and "conflicts" in physics: so widespread understanding of his alleged discoveries would save theorists a lot of effort.

Also he is has indicated that some physics experiments are poorly thought out and his work presumably may help clarify matters.

Maybe he got so down about the rejection he got from the powers-that-be it is a slow process to realise it's a new world today and he can be more optimistic.

History shows a great deal can be achieved by good thinking.

On what grounds can you claim all his equations are not correct? Tautologies self-perpetrate their correctness.

If you read "QED. The Strange Theory Of Light and matter" by Richard Feynman; you will see that there is a puzzle to be solved there. That this theory of "drawing little arrows on paper and adding them" (adding probability amplitudes) achieves so much, deserves some unravelling.

-Alan

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins