Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: :Religion N People

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by bzrd on January 23, 2000 13:49:53 UTC

: : : bzrd here: Suppose that the Bible is an integrated message system from outside our time domain and what we refer to as "aliens" are actually angelic hosts that inhabit the second Heaven. And that some of these are evil and seek to decieve us into thinking they are E.T.'s. Their M.O. is to tell people that they "spawned us" so as to set up the one world religion as prophesized in the Book of Revelation. Suppose that Jesus spoke of this deception in the Gospel of Matthew. If this is true, then Jesus remembers tommorow, which would seem to preclude the possibility of someone traveling back through time to alter history.

: hmmm.....suppose that the aliens that seeded us actually inhibit on a star system that we 1 day discovers thorugh our endless pursuit to seek out extraterestial beings...and that they are infact quite similar to us and have already colonised and seeded a few worlds..and begin to establish trade with us..wad then? and suppose the 1st question is totally independant of the 2nd?

bzrd here: On what basis does one exclude the possibility that these beings are extra-dimensional rather than extra-terrestrial? The existance of E.T. is purely speculative whereas the existance higher dimensions are founded in pure science. Further, if we were "seeded", that begs the question of who "seeded" them. Francis Crick [Noble Prize winner for elucidating the DNA molec] was first to postulate the notion of "seeding" as a means of escaping the inevitable conclusion that we were Created. Crick and Sir Fred Hoyle [mathematician] did the first probability study on the chance of a DNA molec forming through a random process. Why don't they put this in the science textbooks????

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins