Here is a very in-depth and scientific paper dealing with the accumulation of dust on the moon, showing it could not be as old as said.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/magazines/tj/moondust(v7n1)/moondust.asp

It is very technical, so take your time.


Sam, KC2GWX

• You got it backwards - yanniru - September 10, 2002 - 14:30 UTC
  • yet another insult - emperor__alikar - September 11, 2002 - 23:31 UTC
    • Aaron, what is the source of your authority to 'eject' Yanniru? - carefuluniverse - September 12, 2002 - 01:36 UTC
      • Authority? Wouldn't that be the admins job? Oh and I'm an Adult! - emperor__alikar - September 12, 2002 - 03:05 UTC
        • Congratulations and 10-4 - carefuluniverse - September 12, 2002 - 06:28 UTC
          • I apologize to Sam - yanniru - September 12, 2002 - 11:09 UTC
• Moon Dust Not - jhuggins - September 11, 2002 - 12:33 UTC
• And if you even just bothered to read the conclusion! - richard - September 11, 2002 - 15:12 UTC
• Occam's Razor says No Way Jose! (Plus numbers can lie! ) - cosmosapiens - September 11, 2002 - 18:01 UTC
  • View: The Big Myth (Creationism as a Meme) - cosmosapiens - September 11, 2002 - 18:59 UTC
    • Do evolutionists create? Do behaviorists think? - carefuluniverse - September 12, 2002 - 01:04 UTC
• Great online resource for addressing Creationist "Challenges" - luis_hamburgh - September 11, 2002 - 21:31 UTC