Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Try This Paper Too By Brown

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on September 6, 2002 18:41:20 UTC

This one was written earlier, but it also addresses a question you had in mind:

For example:

"This last example raises a touchy question. Suppose Jane and Mary fully agree on the set of inferences licensed by the concept of a chair, but when faced with a particular modernistic contrivance Jane denies that the item is a chair while Mary unhesitatingly takes the item to be a chair. Do we want to say that this is a case of two people with slightly different concepts of a chair -- as a Sellarsian approach would seem to require -- or do we want to describe this as a case of two people who share a concept but hold different beliefs about whether a particular item falls under that concept? The crucial point to be made for present purposes is that this is not a question that can be settled once and for all by a priori examination of our current concepts of a concept and a belief."


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins