Yeah I have been doing research alot more than I used to. I also... Well let me give you an example.
Before time on this board:
Q: How can your possible think that the forest should be cleared?
A: How can you possibly think IT SHOULDN'T!
Q: Wow. That was intelligent.
A: Shut up you Evo!
After time on this board:
Q: How can your possible think that the forest should be cleared?
A: Well in my opinion to protect the forest from the exterme risk of fires durring the dry season we should have loggers come in to remove the dead tress, which are extermly flamable. Also I think that buffers should be placed in the forest the prevent a fire from getting out of control. Another point is that roads should be contructed in the forest to provide for easy access to fires while they are still small. A further point to take to account was last years death of 3 firemen and 1 firewomen when they couldn't use the water from a stream to put out a growing fire around them because an endangered spiecies of fish swam in that stream. In conslusion I think that the bush plan which includes all of this except the lasst point sould be implimented. The reason why the last point wouldn't be an issue is that the firemen would be there in the first place because they would have come in by road instead of helicopter.
See much better. I also just restated my whole opinion again and added even more. ;-)
God Bless,
-Aaron
P.S. By Math person in ment somebody who was better in math class than english class. Sorry if I confused you. |