Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
But Alexander Could Have Made A Better Argument Vs Goedel

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on August 8, 2002 03:56:47 UTC

You Guys and Goedel are so funny...
Math is perfect if applied correctly to a problem.

Luis wrote:
"Godel brought to light with his Incompleteness Theorem ...that math itself (and thus logic, as you point out) is imperfect. Specifically, a mathematical set will always be capable of generating problems that it cannot resolve without amending itself.

The Incompleteness Theorem is something I've felt
was unnecessary. When I heard about it, I was a mailman, not a space scientist. Does it have any uses, or is it just a useless curiosity?

Luis wrote:
"It was my (and others') big contention with Alexander, who claimed math was 'perfect,' but who hasn't been around for ages. Yours is a neat example;"

At the risk of being accurate beyond politeness, I observe that was a "nut" example. And since my name was pulled into the example in question, I think I'm not being impolite...unless I don't understand which example you mean?

Math may be perfect in another way. If applied
to the problem at hand, it sometimes gives a perfect result.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins