Dr. Stafford,

Respectfully, I will reply soon.
That note is quite awesome and I will have to think quite a while but you have laid it out very well. I think slowly between errands.... certainly it could be EXCELLENT as science fiction, which I love. Whether your Theory proves true soon or not, you are proving a good explainer, better and better, on the face of it. I don't know whether I will still think that after reading. I am baring my igorance before I reply more fully. I apologize in advance.

On a separate note:
I'm sorry you cannot tolerate Yanniru better.
It's true that he does LIE a lot and is ANNOYING
and TEASING just for fun it seems, almost all the time. Please accept that I am not telling you what to say,
but the reason I don't yell at him
with all caps is that he is not taking it seriously and would just giggle to himself, I think. He could easily be an agent, btw, since
what he is doing does create an effect which might benefit someone.

Thank you,
Mike

• Thank YOU! - doctordick - July 25, 2002 - 17:51 UTC
• Mike Whittier is another Mike pearson - yanniru - July 25, 2002 - 20:34 UTC
  • Whittier is Mike's middle name, but no "Mike Whittier" posted - carefuluniverse - July 26, 2002 - 01:49 UTC
    • Why the need for many names? - yanniru - July 28, 2002 - 13:03 UTC
      • Why have 3/5 of your posts been offensive drivel? - kantolfir2 - July 28, 2002 - 16:53 UTC
        • It's my lack of respect - yanniru - July 29, 2002 - 14:32 UTC
          • I don't think even you know what you mean - kantolfir2 - July 29, 2002 - 16:58 UTC