The alleged terrorist who is defending himself right now coined a word that was new to me but expressed what Clinton did quite well. He said that Clinton told the technical truth. The judge had defined what having sex meant and on that basis Clinton did not have sex. But the terrorist is correct for that is the technical truth that is often used in courts to escape justice.

Clinton did not escape because when the average person fully learned exactly what happened in the White House, we all concluded that it was sex and it was immoral. So Clinton was unable to hid behind a technicality.

People with less power and scrutiny are still able to do so. An example is the tale of the Saudi Princess and her abused housekeeper. The Princess is now free to live in Florida, but the housekeeper is confined to Saudi Arabia.

Regards,

Richard

• Greetings Richard - jisbond - July 9, 2002 - 22:11 UTC
  • I agree that most Muslims have never been terrorists - kantolfir2 - July 9, 2002 - 23:27 UTC
    • freedom of inquiry; answer these harder questions.. - jisbond - July 9, 2002 - 23:48 UTC
      • If you cannot answer those Q's, the catalogue didn't help you? - kantolfir2 - July 10, 2002 - 06:52 UTC
  • Congratulations jisbond - yanniru - July 10, 2002 - 16:49 UTC
• for a "life-long Democrat" you sure conceded the point easily - kantolfir2 - July 9, 2002 - 23:22 UTC
  • did I say "to dumb?" Indeed, it should be a verb! - kantolfir2 - July 9, 2002 - 23:39 UTC
  • A "life-long Democrat" 'the mrs.' - jisbond - July 9, 2002 - 23:51 UTC
    • Indeed...she did not spend $70 million of tax money - kantolfir2 - July 10, 2002 - 06:53 UTC
      • Topic Reaply: "What do you say to that?" - jisbond - July 12, 2002 - 00:05 UTC
        • What about "why is is your business?" - kantolfir2 - July 12, 2002 - 00:27 UTC
        • Why is it your business and how did greed connect to your topic? - kantolfir2 - July 12, 2002 - 00:29 UTC