"I don't need to read those articles, mainly because they ignore the issues of how their is no physical evidence of a flood."

You continually amaze me you disregard my links without looking at them! Read your sentence above again. You don't need to read the articles, mainly because they ignore the physical evidence.
HOW DO YOU KNOW???? YOU DIDN'T EVEN READ THEM!!!!!

http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/19390.shtml

Look at some of these links again. You might be suprised at the physical evidence for the flood.

If you won't accept my links, what am I to do? Those links are my main source of information, I do not have enough personal experience to argue with you.

"You know nothing of geology. You can't even find websites that do."

Geology and the flood: http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-006.htm

There is a website that does. And I had already posted it before. I guess you completely ignore my post. How convienient.

"Any person who believes in the global flood doesn't."

Oops, wrong again!!! Here are 54 scientist (with doctorates in their fields) who believe in the global flood:

http://www.icr.org/newsletters/impact/impactapr02.html

Kung-fu fists flying?

KC2GWX

• So powerful are those links... - richard - June 29, 2002 - 18:18 UTC
  • ...that you ignore them again. - kc2gwx - June 30, 2002 - 23:32 UTC
    • Wait a second. - richard - July 1, 2002 - 03:22 UTC