that they don't even refute the points I have raised bearing on both the lack of aggregate in shales that are part of an interbedded shale / sandstone formation. Explain potholes, not the roadway ones, but the holes in exposed rock. Explain coral that is hundreds of feet below the surface of Ohio, yet this same strata is exposed in the cliffs of Bruce Pennisula in Ontario.

Once again, you post links and ignore my points on actual geology. The reason I won't read the ICR articles, is because the ones I've read have been so thoroughly disproven it amazes me that you even bother reading them yourself.

Neither of us have taken courses in geology. I however, have read books on the subject and have alot of professional experience in that field. You've done neither.

So, if you want to actually be taken seriously, perhaps you can FINALLY RESPOND to my points on geology without posting more links on other issues. Until you can explain how coral could exist under Ohio and be exposed in Ontario with a flood model, then lets have it. Until then, you've got no footing on this subject at all.

• ...that you ignore them again. - kc2gwx - June 30, 2002 - 23:32 UTC
  • Wait a second. - richard - July 1, 2002 - 03:22 UTC