Aaron, The Story Is A Myth - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Aaron, The Story Is A Myth

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Rich on June 3, 2002 16:23:04 UTC

George Washington never admitted cutting down a Cherry Tree. Paul Revere didn't do the whole British are coming thing, he was captured and Sam Adams did the rest. These are myths. You know, the Gilgamesh Epic existed long before the Noah story was born, as well.

But if you want to believe the Flood story is true, you need to get around the geology issues I brought up. And that is just the tip of the iceberg. And that is what this thread is about. If you want to believe the flood occured, then alright, but you must make one concession. There is no geologic evidence that a flood ever happened.

Follow Ups:

Nope. - kc2gwx - June 3, 2002 - 17:57 UTC
- Sam Patterson, could you remark on my points - richard - June 3, 2002 - 19:05 UTC
  - He can't - harvey1 - June 3, 2002 - 19:54 UTC
    - Hey Harvey. - richard - June 3, 2002 - 20:16 UTC
      - Sorry, I can't dance - harvey1 - June 3, 2002 - 20:58 UTC
    - You have no clue what you are talking about, do you? - kc2gwx - June 3, 2002 - 21:10 UTC
      - Some people hold that opinion - harvey1 - June 3, 2002 - 21:46 UTC
        
        I'm spelling it out. - kc2gwx - June 3, 2002 - 22:05 UTC
        
        So, then - harvey1 - June 3, 2002 - 22:17 UTC
        
        Well then... - kc2gwx - June 3, 2002 - 22:29 UTC
        
        There's a good reason - harvey1 - June 3, 2002 - 23:01 UTC
        
        Balance. - kc2gwx - June 4, 2002 - 02:51 UTC
        
        Misunderstanding on your part - harvey1 - June 4, 2002 - 14:28 UTC
        
        Your wrong. - kc2gwx - June 4, 2002 - 16:14 UTC
        
        Not ridiculous - harvey1 - June 4, 2002 - 19:09 UTC
        
        BULL - emperor__alikar - June 4, 2002 - 17:03 UTC
        
        Chuckle - harvey1 - June 4, 2002 - 21:28 UTC
        
        Nope yet another false opinon - emperor__alikar - June 4, 2002 - 21:57 UTC
        
        I'm sure about Albert - harvey1 - June 5, 2002 - 00:01 UTC
        
        Just look at what fundamentalism did to Islamic science - yanniru - June 5, 2002 - 14:09 UTC
        
        To continue on Harvey's well written post... - richard - June 4, 2002 - 02:03 UTC
        
        K. - kc2gwx - June 4, 2002 - 02:26 UTC
        
        If our discussions are going to go somewhere... - richard - June 4, 2002 - 14:32 UTC
        
        Good old 386... - kc2gwx - June 4, 2002 - 16:20 UTC
        
        Sam, I like what you're saying in this post - carefuluniverse - June 4, 2002 - 00:46 UTC
        
        Buddhism and Taoism - richard - June 4, 2002 - 02:07 UTC
        
        "spurred from" is not in my lexicon of science - carefuluniverse - June 4, 2002 - 17:15 UTC
        
        Oh, sorry I was so terse - carefuluniverse - June 4, 2002 - 17:22 UTC
        
        Didn't we go through this? - kc2gwx - June 4, 2002 - 02:35 UTC
        
        Jesus said he was the son of man - yanniru - June 4, 2002 - 14:51 UTC
        
        You are shockingly wrong. - kc2gwx - June 4, 2002 - 16:35 UTC
        
        Your quotes are correct - yanniru - June 4, 2002 - 21:18 UTC
        
        Oh please. - kc2gwx - June 4, 2002 - 22:08 UTC
        
        He specifically said how to get to heaven - yanniru - June 5, 2002 - 14:24 UTC
        
        What is your religion anyway? - kc2gwx - June 5, 2002 - 14:39 UTC
        
        Because he told me - yanniru - June 6, 2002 - 00:35 UTC
        
        Paradox. - kc2gwx - June 6, 2002 - 01:26 UTC
        
        Moses covered that one - yanniru - June 6, 2002 - 14:54 UTC
        
        No. - kc2gwx - June 6, 2002 - 15:38 UTC
        
        Sam, I must insist that you actually read the Qu'ran... - richard - June 6, 2002 - 16:23 UTC
        
        Joke. - kc2gwx - June 6, 2002 - 19:24 UTC
        
        All religions are valid - yanniru - June 6, 2002 - 21:28 UTC
        
        What is a religion then? Many followers don't even go deep - carefuluniverse - June 7, 2002 - 00:45 UTC
        
        All followers are valid as well - yanniru - June 7, 2002 - 15:02 UTC
        
        If "all" are right there's no need for the word "error" - carefuluniverse - June 7, 2002 - 23:17 UTC
        
        Tell me who knows the truth - yanniru - June 10, 2002 - 14:44 UTC
        
        more of your little quips - carefuluniverse - June 10, 2002 - 22:53 UTC
        
        (G_D) is closer to you than your Jugular vein. - jisbond - June 6, 2002 - 15:29 UTC
        
        Right on(nt) - yanniru - June 7, 2002 - 14:54 UTC
  - No problem - kc2gwx - June 3, 2002 - 21:13 UTC
    - I'm still waiting for your reply - richard - June 5, 2002 - 11:42 UTC
      - And I thank you for that. - kc2gwx - June 5, 2002 - 14:27 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins