Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
To Continue On Harvey's Well Written Post...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Rich on June 4, 2002 02:03:35 UTC

It isn't that we fear creationism being true. We fear what YEC or ID try to teach. YEC involves very little critical thinking. This is a detriment to science. If we bring up children who can't think critically, what progress can they make?

Obviously science has alot of merit behind it. From medicines to car safety, science has proven itself. Scientists found solutions to problems in life. This isn't possible when critical thinking is replaced by look it up in the bible thinking.

However, as Harvey said, creationism is so easy to follow. You don't really need to have it explained to you unlike real science. That's why most people get their weather forecasts on tv instead of making their own forecasts from models available on the internet. Or why people watch news programs like Dateline. People watch it because its simple. People like simplicity, it helps them feel better about themselves. Please have no delusions about it, that much is true. Look at America Online, that's how easy they needed to make it for people to use it. Look at Windows and how XP is dumbed down. Man I yearn for the days of DOS. That was an operating system you could use. So when you take a very complicated science verse it against a relatively simple tell all creationism, people have a propensity to move towards the path of least resistance.

If you noticed, the Electoral College system was created to keep the people from having direct power to electing the President. Why? Because they didn't trust the general public's ability to both a) know the issues and b) be able to judge intelligently on the issues.

This is why folks like Harvey and I feel that something needs to keep YEC'ers at bay.

But let me point your question out in another way. If YEC were so true, then why have there been no published articles in science journals for YEC?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins