Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Sam Is Now An Expert In Primatology And Evolution

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Scott Abernathy on May 30, 2002 18:08:38 UTC

I hear ICR is looking for a few good men (and the rest will be idiots).

You blathered -
"1. She had a U-shaped jaw, which is usual for Gorrilas

2. Long curved fingers and toes, which meant she was well adapted for swing in trees"

Are we to assume from these two statements that gorillas are arboreal? Do gorillas swing from tree to tree? Let me ask you this. Is a gorilla a monkey or an ape? Do you even know the difference? Go ahead and look it up on the web, then give us your version of what you meant by your statements.

And what would happen if a certain segment of tree-dwelling old-world monkies was exposed to a shift in climate, making their forest biome a grassland biome. Do you suppose they hopped the next airplane and flew to the nearest forest.

I got an idea - try reading about the descent of man and learn the scientific theory behind it. What a novel idea. Nobody can take you seriously because you don't have even the basics of evolutionary theory or biology learned in order to debate logically.

You rambled -
" Pygmy chimps today can walk paritally upright."

And bonoboos engage in frontal copulation, so what? So because other animals walk upright that is evidence that there is no direct lineage present. That is great - with one fatal swoop you tore down the entire theory of australiopithocene and hominid evolution. You are good, I bet ICR is licking their chops for you to get on board.

"6. The knee points to the ability to climb trees, not so much to walk upright."

Transitional species, perhaps?

"Not on the evolutionary path to man."

Stirring. Profound. Insipid?


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins