Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Sam Patterson on May 23, 2002 19:18:47 UTC

"If science supported creationism most of the scientists would hold that model up as the one to follow. However, this is not the case. Not even close. This goes especially Young Earth Creationism."

Not to offend you, but can you speak for the entire scientific community? Several posters here
think they can.

"Intelligent design doesn't seem to make logical sense."

Evolution makes logical sense? Look at the most 'simple' organism and tell me it was random

I've got to run, I'm gonna go see star wars II.
Hope it's good. KC2GWX 73's

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins