Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Sam Patterson on May 15, 2002 16:36:10 UTC

"There work may be technical and geniune, but there conclusions cannot be supported by science."

Umm......isn't this a contradicting sentence?
If their work if technical and geniune, then doesn't that mean it is scientific? You can't say
that they are geniune arguements that can't be supported by science. What make them geniune?

"Maybe God uses evolution to create. Has that ever crossed your mind?"

Old earth creation is a impossiblity. First of all, if you believe in evolution, then you can not believe in the first book of Genesis. No matter how you interpret it, Genesis points to
six-day creation. And if you don't believe the first book, then just throw away the rest.

"God is intangible and science is based on tangible reality."

Ok, then evolution is not science either. You can
not observe evolution in one lifetime. Therefore it is intangible. KC2GWX 73's

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins