Hi Paul,

I went and reread the post you referred to. Clearly, from my perspective, you are attacking the problem entirely backwards! The fundamental issue is, how do you explain the current state of affairs! Now that explanation must be based on an argument which is 100% compatible with what you know to be true. I don't think your arguments conform to that constraint. Of course, that is just an opinion!

Have fun -- Dick

• Yes, if we are forced to take them serially - pmartin - May 5, 2002 - 04:04 UTC
  • To Paul and Mike! - doctordick - May 6, 2002 - 16:05 UTC
    • To Dr. Stafford and Friends - spazcon - May 6, 2002 - 18:24 UTC
      • I respectfully disagree - pmartin - May 6, 2002 - 20:26 UTC
        • I'll look it over - spazcon - May 6, 2002 - 21:20 UTC
          • I'm not out to persuade you of anything... - pmartin - May 7, 2002 - 00:14 UTC
            • If it's obvious, I'll just delegate...I'm obviously going broke! - spazcon - May 7, 2002 - 04:53 UTC
              • It's your choice - pmartin - May 7, 2002 - 05:31 UTC
                • Is it the Treatis concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge? - quiet - May 9, 2002 - 05:22 UTC
        • in fact, will copy it right now in case of earthquake ! - spazcon - May 6, 2002 - 21:21 UTC
          • the earthquake is more like a dumslide ! - spazcon - May 7, 2002 - 05:05 UTC
            • I don't get it - pmartin - May 7, 2002 - 05:36 UTC
              • I hope not - spazcon - May 7, 2002 - 06:24 UTC
    • Thank you, Dick - pmartin - May 7, 2002 - 15:45 UTC
  • After I have some serial and do chores, will work on yours - spazcon - May 6, 2002 - 18:30 UTC