Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
An Opinion On Your Disagreement

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Paul R. Martin on February 26, 2002 17:11:14 UTC

In my opinion, Alan has made an excellent case for his position and explained it very well. I am inclined to agree with him completely, although I don't have much experience or knowledge to back it up.

As for Richard's disagreement that "psychological sickness does not exist", I think that what Alan is saying is that if there is such a sickness, it would be neurological, and it should be treated by neurologists. The error is that there are no "sicknesses" left to be called "psychological" after you remove the neurological sickness and the inconvenient behavior cases.

Warm regards,


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins