Dear not especially Harv,
you klutz :) (oops, a "personal attack" Should I
weep and gnash my teeth, since you are kind and good?) I think you're not a nice guy, Harv.
One of the gentlest lies Harv wrote above was:
"Just admit it Mike. You have absolutely no interest in content"
My brief reply, starting with
_____________________________________
Harv’s comments about posting links
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/13133.shtml?base=120
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/13090.shtml?base=120
and
Harv and Dr. Dick talk about ‘Mental Models‘,
(a term which they rediscovered this week)
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/13597.shtml?base=90
____________________________________
A few of the links Mike posted:
Evolutionary Biology White Paper
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/13013.shtml?base=120
Human Overpopulation
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/13112.shtml?base=120
(a site by someone who
exchanged several notes with me in 1995, before he made this site)
While the Soviets were doing this:
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/14448.shtml?base=30
_______________________________
Other ‘content’ Mike posted
McCluhan and Angelism
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/12862.shtml?base=120
Not prejudiced against Harv
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/13627.shtml?base=90
Re: Alex’s math and strong atheism
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/14392.shtml?base=30
Real math proves limits of mechanics
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/12942.shtml
Thinking introduces the mathematically unpredictable
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/12741.shtml?show=top
“God and Science”
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/14975.shtml?show=top
Love,from Mik
but not for Harv,
for he's not either my neighbor OR my enemy
|