|
|
|||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
No Collapse Theory
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Richard Ruquist on February 5, 2002 16:02:28 UTC |
The all-fields interpretation of quantum mechanics assumes that the fields or quantum waves collapse to a point in order to interact with other kinds of fields. The all-particles interpetation (no fields or quantum waves, just math probabilities) does not need a collapse theory as the particles are already close to being points. However, according to Feymann's quantum electrodynamics, anti-particles coming back from the future are required. Contrary to what Alex claims, these anti-particles must exist beyond the uncertainty time in order to solve double-slit paradox.
|
|
Additional Information |
---|
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |