The more science explains, the less room for god. What yesterday was gods' business (thunder, life, etc.) today is explained naturally (as a consequence of mathematical rules wich we still historically call natural laws).

Today God is making Big Bang, tomorrow Big Bang will be mathematically derived from inflation and power of God will shrink again.

• It's a Gaussian curve - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 13:20 UTC
  • Correction - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 13:21 UTC
    • A dangerous step - ymateen - January 24, 2002 - 17:00 UTC
      • The art of subjectivity - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 19:15 UTC
        • Harv's post translated to English - aurino - January 24, 2002 - 20:03 UTC
          • Humor or serious? - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 20:12 UTC
        • Harvey, define nature, please. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 20:59 UTC
          • That's not what I'm saying - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 21:23 UTC
            • Alex, read the writing on the wall - aurino - January 24, 2002 - 21:33 UTC
              • Prove? - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 21:41 UTC
                • We must infer??? - doctordick - January 25, 2002 - 14:03 UTC
                  • We must define??? - aurino - January 25, 2002 - 14:56 UTC
                  • That's right - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 15:00 UTC
            • Is anything wrong with Newton's laws? - alexander - January 25, 2002 - 23:24 UTC
              • Doesn't work in QM - harvey1 - January 26, 2002 - 01:54 UTC
                • Correction. - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 00:26 UTC
              • Some issues regarding the correction - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 02:03 UTC
                • Correction - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 02:04 UTC
        • Correction: H-D method not H-T method (nt) - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 15:40 UTC
  • Harvey, you mention just people's opinion. No F(ACTS) of gods. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 19:02 UTC
    • Holy principle - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 19:50 UTC
      • If to look for gods, more logical would be to say math=god(s). - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 20:42 UTC
        • But, I'm talking about a higher principle - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 20:50 UTC
          • Harvey, again, unification is the result of math. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 21:03 UTC
            • You named it holy! - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 21:34 UTC
              • Yes, if you mean "mathematical" by holy, I agree. - alexander - January 24, 2002 - 22:06 UTC
                • It is higher than mathematical - harvey1 - January 24, 2002 - 22:26 UTC
                  • Math (logic) starts exactly when anything comes to existence. - alexander - January 25, 2002 - 00:18 UTC
                    • Cart before the horse - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 01:27 UTC
                      • Incorrect.First I label"something" and then call it "existing" - alexander - January 25, 2002 - 04:21 UTC
                    • That's still cart before the horse - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 15:07 UTC
                      • "Something" is not a principle. - alexander - January 26, 2002 - 00:26 UTC
                    • That would defeat the purpose - harvey1 - January 26, 2002 - 00:55 UTC
                      • Harvey, word "before" has no meaning here. - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 00:46 UTC
                    • That's not what I meant by the term 'before' - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 02:50 UTC
                      • Finally you start understanding. - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 17:22 UTC
                    • Hey, wait a second... - harvey1 - January 27, 2002 - 17:49 UTC