Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Am Very Sorry Alan.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard D. Stafford, Ph.D. on December 24, 2001 17:24:37 UTC

Alan,

Please don’t continue to push this issue as I really doubt it is possible for us to communicate. I will answer here only to show you what my reactions to some of your ideas amount to.

(13) "You" is an inexplicable concept! Being inexplicable, a relationship with inexplicability does not constitute a definition and (14-16) make no sense.

(17-19) You are presuming the information becomes available in some specific order!

(20) You are presuming that the concept "location" is defined!

(22) No, I have pointed out that "I" is beyond my ability to discuss (not part of reality as I have defined reality).

(23) So "exist" is defined by some list you keep?

(24) This comment is so decorated with presumed concepts that it cannot even be discussed from a rational perspective

>>>"Stafford reality" could just as well be defined as "a set of people's names".

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins