Everyone,

Interesting site:

http://www.bright.net/~mrf/

If you feel this web site presents incorrect or misleading information, and you wish to illustrate this for the rest of us, please cite least one pertinent online reference that supports your perspective.

:)

• My visit to hyperspace - jisbond - December 7, 2001 - 05:45 UTC
  • Hyperspace, huh? - smartguy - December 7, 2001 - 06:17 UTC
    • Steve Martin - luis_hamburgh - December 8, 2001 - 01:05 UTC
      • A word about hyperspace: - jisbond - December 8, 2001 - 01:31 UTC
        • Ok now I'm being serious... - smartguy - December 8, 2001 - 17:44 UTC
          • I messed up on the links... - smartguy - December 8, 2001 - 17:58 UTC
            • transfiguration of the essence of a human being - jisbond - December 8, 2001 - 18:34 UTC
          • a foot in hell a foot in heaven and a view of the physical world - jisbond - December 8, 2001 - 18:25 UTC
            • I looked it up. Thanks. - jisbond - December 8, 2001 - 18:36 UTC
• No sugar- a non-frivolous response - yanniru - December 7, 2001 - 15:08 UTC
  • A rebuttal - pmartin - December 7, 2001 - 17:27 UTC
    • Paul, what does mean "qualitevely different outer space"? - alexander - December 7, 2001 - 18:23 UTC
      • It means that gravitons don't exist there - pmartin - December 7, 2001 - 23:52 UTC
        • Universe has future emergent topological possiblities - carefuluniverse - December 8, 2001 - 01:06 UTC
          • must be a typo - clarify - carefuluniverse - December 8, 2001 - 01:09 UTC
            • type of force , not "distance" sets collision arithmetic - carefuluniverse - December 8, 2001 - 01:21 UTC
            • Answer: - pmartin - December 9, 2001 - 08:27 UTC
              • thank you - spazcon - December 11, 2001 - 00:56 UTC
                • repost - spazcon - December 11, 2001 - 00:57 UTC
          • PLEASE forgive us for letting CarefulUniverse say that - spazcon - December 8, 2001 - 01:51 UTC
        • Paul, 2 questions (beyond "space or not space?" one). - alexander - December 9, 2001 - 19:14 UTC
          • Alex, 2 answers. - pmartin - December 9, 2001 - 23:19 UTC
            • I have known about 2, 3, and 4 dimensions, but... - phillipmartin - December 13, 2001 - 01:56 UTC
    • Thank you, Paul - luis_hamburgh - December 8, 2001 - 00:48 UTC
  • Thanks Yanniru - luis_hamburgh - December 8, 2001 - 01:28 UTC
    • Mass less likely to collapse in 2-d - yanniru - December 8, 2001 - 17:47 UTC
      • Richard, can mass exist in 2-D at all? - alexander - December 9, 2001 - 19:26 UTC
        • The 2-d approximation in nature - yanniru - December 10, 2001 - 15:32 UTC
          • I have a few questions... - phillipmartin - December 11, 2001 - 00:47 UTC
            • Two cents - luis_hamburgh - December 11, 2001 - 03:42 UTC
              • Kip Thorne meant 2-d symmetry - yanniru - December 11, 2001 - 14:32 UTC
                • Those posts answered my question about 2-d. - phillipmartin - December 13, 2001 - 01:28 UTC
                  • No mass, but perhaps gravity - yanniru - December 13, 2001 - 16:01 UTC
                    • I have no idea. - phillipmartin - December 13, 2001 - 23:25 UTC
• "big crunch" might have already taken place - jisbond - December 8, 2001 - 05:03 UTC
  • Prior humanoids in our galaxy - yanniru - December 8, 2001 - 17:55 UTC
    • Perhaps so. (n.t.) - jisbond - December 8, 2001 - 18:38 UTC