The accordian universe in a post above is an example of one such universe. There is also strong belief that dimensions on the order of microns to milimeters exist and the next generation of accelerators are supposed to investigate them.

• In addition - yanniru - November 27, 2001 - 15:50 UTC
  • I hope they are. - pmartin - November 27, 2001 - 17:49 UTC
    • So, how to explain inverse square law then? - alexander - November 28, 2001 - 00:19 UTC
      • Two answers - yanniru - November 28, 2001 - 15:12 UTC
        • Richard, I peronally contributed in dismissal of - alexander - November 28, 2001 - 20:42 UTC
          • Reference please to your publication - yanniru - November 29, 2001 - 15:20 UTC
            • For Richard (about gravity on mm scale). - alexander - December 1, 2001 - 02:27 UTC
              • Casmuir effect - yanniru - December 1, 2001 - 19:10 UTC
                • Way far. Casimir is 10^-6 or so. nt - alexander - December 3, 2001 - 22:39 UTC
      • Alex = Priest! - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 01:00 UTC
        • Luis, stupidity continues? - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:47 UTC
          • Alex = 1st non-religious person on my ignore list. :( - luis_hamburgh - December 2, 2001 - 21:15 UTC
            • - luis_hamburgh - December 3, 2001 - 18:26 UTC
            • Luis, if we have inverse square, space is 3-D (for gravity). - alexander - December 3, 2001 - 22:42 UTC
      • The explanation of Inverse Square Law - pmartin - November 30, 2001 - 18:43 UTC
        • Paul, don't you see the obvious? - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 19:01 UTC
          • No. At least it is not obvious to me. - pmartin - December 1, 2001 - 01:28 UTC
            • If our space were "imbedded" inverse square would fail. - alexander - December 1, 2001 - 02:07 UTC
              • Not necessarily - pmartin - December 1, 2001 - 05:01 UTC
                • I think, mathematicians did that 100 years ago or so. - alexander - December 3, 2001 - 22:48 UTC