(1)Science:
"The process of evaluating answers/solutions to questions/problems,thus gather valid(meaningful:consistant with existing framework of scientific knowledge) and reliable(uniformly successful in passing scientific trials) information,using nothing but the scientific method."

I want to understand the boundaries and limitations of this scientific method and a clear demarkation of valid and reliable information.

(2)God:
A term that refers to the most superior being or in Einstein's words 'an objective reality'. All the religions,myths,beliefs describe Gods with more or less same characteristics.

In a forum entitled 'God and Science', can anything asserted be good science (since God is something outside the sphere of scientific method). The question that comes out is "Is it appropriate to predict anything about nonfactual and nonscientific phenomena such as God(s) on the basis of information gathered on nothing but sound scientific grounds?"

(3) What are gentle questions? And who is to decide that?

• 1,2,3 - carefuluniverse - November 25, 2001 - 09:43 UTC
  • 1 - ymateen - November 25, 2001 - 12:04 UTC
    • Their words answer you so well - carefuluniverse - November 26, 2001 - 06:30 UTC
      • Scientific method is observing fact and explaining it logically. - alexander - November 26, 2001 - 22:03 UTC
        • Chances!!!! - ymateen - November 27, 2001 - 16:24 UTC
          • "to be bold that much.... scientifically?" (nt) - ymateen - November 27, 2001 - 16:43 UTC
          • More than enough. - alexander - November 27, 2001 - 20:45 UTC
            • Those old-fashioned 'gods' are not the only option - dolphin - November 28, 2001 - 06:41 UTC
            • God, philosophy and Science - ymateen - November 28, 2001 - 16:10 UTC
              • Science had already proven nonexistence of god. - alexander - November 28, 2001 - 20:30 UTC
                • Alex: Stephen Hawking found God but didn't recognise Him - dolphin - November 29, 2001 - 06:25 UTC
                  • Hawkins and many Nobelists belive in god. They are just wrong. - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 15:11 UTC
                    • They also believed in ether(nt) - yanniru - November 29, 2001 - 15:14 UTC
                      • There also was this guy who thought... - smartguy - November 29, 2001 - 15:56 UTC
                        • fortunately, science does not deal with beliefs, but with facts. - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 22:48 UTC
                          • You are the second biggest "arguer from authority" on this list - carefuluniverse - November 30, 2001 - 02:50 UTC
                            • I just state the fact(hat schience deals with facts,not belifs) - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 04:06 UTC
                              • Alex: do you believe this to be a fact? - dolphin - December 2, 2001 - 07:23 UTC
                                • Regardless my belief, science deals with FACTS. - alexander - December 3, 2001 - 20:13 UTC
                    • Hawking defines God as "Universal Order" - sound familiar? (nt) - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 00:42 UTC
                      • Just another name of math (logic). - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:23 UTC
                        • But Hawking recognizes the need for higher dimensions (nt) - luis_hamburgh - December 1, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
                • Alex: the subject is: EXISTENCE IS WHO IS. - dolphin - November 29, 2001 - 06:29 UTC
                  • Alan, you said nonsence statements (beings, trios, etc). - alexander - November 29, 2001 - 15:02 UTC
                    • I am talking about a certain claim - dolphin - December 2, 2001 - 07:27 UTC
                • It's logically impossible to prove inexistence of God (nt - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 00:41 UTC
                  • No, vice versa: logically god simply does NOT exist. - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 18:22 UTC
                    • You cannot change logic, only your image of stubbornness. - luis_hamburgh - December 7, 2001 - 03:00 UTC
          • Shall I believe the technologist or the theorist? - carefuluniverse - November 28, 2001 - 18:25 UTC
            • Still looking for "beings" around? - alexander - November 28, 2001 - 20:32 UTC
              • Hope you meant that in a nice way - carefuluniverse - November 29, 2001 - 05:05 UTC
        • Alexander is teasing. Real math proves limits of mechanics - carefuluniverse - November 30, 2001 - 19:02 UTC
          • Michael, do you want to say something or what? - alexander - December 1, 2001 - 01:38 UTC
• Yazir, if god is objective reality, why to use 2 terms then? - alexander - November 26, 2001 - 20:59 UTC
  • God of Order - ymateen - November 27, 2001 - 16:38 UTC
    • God likes athesists - yanniru - November 27, 2001 - 16:55 UTC
      • If it were _really my opinion, would I live it? - carefuluniverse - November 28, 2001 - 07:25 UTC
        • An honest god! - yanniru - November 28, 2001 - 15:09 UTC
          • I Am not rejecting this notion but we have developed - carefuluniverse - December 2, 2001 - 03:25 UTC
      • Exact statement required - ymateen - November 28, 2001 - 16:24 UTC
        • Never heard of god of order before - yanniru - November 28, 2001 - 16:31 UTC
          • G.O.D coined in"hyperspace' by KUKU(nt) - ymateen - November 28, 2001 - 16:41 UTC
          • i.e G.O.O (god of order) -nt - ymateen - November 28, 2001 - 16:51 UTC