Here is a basic system of questioning which may lead some of us to a living conscious Creator/Maker:

What causes rain? Clouds.
What causes Clouds? Evaporation.
Which came first? Clouds? Or Water? And does it make a difference which came first? If yes, should we not know why, where, when, how, and by whom?


What caused matter? Clouds of gasses.
What Caused Clouds of Gasses? Matter.
Which came first? Clouds of Gasses or Matter? And does it make a difference which came first? If yes, should we not know why, where, when, how, and by whom?

Could the answer to the above be gravity in matter and anti-matter? And who or what cased gravity? Matter or anti-matter or both?

Would it be too much to ask if we were to ask: Is there someone who contains neither matter nor anti-matter or does any substance of matter and/or anti-matter contain this someone? Is this someone alive and aware needing nothing from its creation but that the creation needs and obtains all that it needs from this someone who is both external and internal but not as understood in the manner that one understands external and internal by the gauging of nearness of bodies?

Jisbond

• Nothing basic here - luis_hamburgh - November 11, 2001 - 15:55 UTC
  • those who understand - jisbond - November 11, 2001 - 16:01 UTC
    • >>>"make one like it" - luis_hamburgh - November 13, 2001 - 00:24 UTC
      • rephrased - jisbond - November 13, 2001 - 19:13 UTC
• Scientific answers - yanniru - November 11, 2001 - 20:50 UTC
  • Sure you should... - smartguy - November 12, 2001 - 04:09 UTC
    • Perhaps we shall - jisbond - November 12, 2001 - 16:34 UTC
  • And answer to science - jisbond - November 12, 2001 - 16:32 UTC
  • I don't think so - luis_hamburgh - November 13, 2001 - 00:30 UTC
    • Super nature - yanniru - November 13, 2001 - 15:22 UTC
      • your comment sounds agreeable to me. - jisbond - November 13, 2001 - 19:19 UTC
    • there is another science, some are aware of this other science - jisbond - November 13, 2001 - 19:17 UTC
      • The other science? You mean "no facts" religion science? - alexander - November 13, 2001 - 19:53 UTC
        • There is no convincing - jisbond - November 13, 2001 - 20:14 UTC