Math is simply logic. Logic starts when you label SOMETHING as "yes", or "1", or "true", or "+" (whatever you like more) and absence of this SOMETHING as "no", "0", "false", "-", etc.

This something can be an object, a concept, a god(s), a relationship, etc - any entity you want.

So, non-exist entities are labeled as 0 in math, therefore existence is not even necessary for a logic (=math) to be correct.

• Fine, just tell us what you are labelling - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 20:16 UTC
  • Harwey, I just said that EXISTENCE is not necessary. - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 20:27 UTC
    • What are you talking about? - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 20:42 UTC
      • Non existencre of ANYTHING. - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 21:18 UTC
        • more to be understood by you - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 22:10 UTC
          • If there is nothing, then there are no sets yet. - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 22:25 UTC
            • Oh please - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 22:29 UTC
              • Harvey, why should I give up what works (science)? - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 23:05 UTC
            • Your idea is not science - just poor metaphysics - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 23:48 UTC
              • Harvey, some of my students make same mistake. - alexander - November 9, 2001 - 00:26 UTC
            • Oh brother, you don't even know what metaphysics is - harvey1 - November 9, 2001 - 00:34 UTC
              • Anything to say about "Being(s)"? :-) - alexander - November 9, 2001 - 00:59 UTC
            • Sure, but P=propaganda in the future - harvey1 - November 9, 2001 - 02:55 UTC
      • What Zero means - quiet - January 14, 2002 - 01:28 UTC
• You fail once again... - smartguy - November 8, 2001 - 20:29 UTC
  • Oh, boy (logic is mystery? why do you use it then?) - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 20:36 UTC
    • Alex, what is the meaning of a word that hasn't been defined? - smartguy - November 8, 2001 - 21:01 UTC
      • Lets explain it to you in a different way. - alexander - November 8, 2001 - 23:28 UTC
        • Oxymoron statement - harvey1 - November 9, 2001 - 00:26 UTC
          • Good. Now you see it more clear :-) - alexander - November 9, 2001 - 00:46 UTC
            • >>>Do you have more questions about power of math? - smartguy - November 9, 2001 - 05:26 UTC
            • Alex: you can not use 1 without implying 3 - dolphin - November 9, 2001 - 07:59 UTC
            • Nothing to compare with before "anything" exists... - smartguy - November 9, 2001 - 16:43 UTC
        • But you don't - harvey1 - November 9, 2001 - 03:45 UTC
    • Define 0? - harvey1 - November 8, 2001 - 21:02 UTC