Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
But Waves Are Invisible

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on October 24, 2001 15:09:55 UTC

I can predict mathematically exactly what electromagnetic waves look like, but I cannot predict the detection of a single quantum or photon event, except statistically.

So is it that math breaks down in those cases or is it that we just do not know that math yet.

If it's just a lack of known math, then math does rule the universe. But as far as we now know, there may be non-math elements at work in going from waves to physical interactive processes.

For a cosmic example, consider the Viliken theory that our universe came from a quantum fluctuation. That is not a wave theory, but is an interaction theory, and the above considerations apply right at the initial creation of the big bang, assuming of course that Viliken is correct. So there could be a non-math element that gets the ball rolling.

A universe ruled by math is quite likely, but not yet a certainty.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins