Hi Harv,

As you know, I am a staunch advocate for Dick and his work. As you also know, I spent nine months of fairly intense (albeit intermittent) work trying to understand and verify Dick's paper with my limited knowledge of math and physics. I got nearly to the end of chapter one before I got hopelessly in over my head. In the process, I feel good about uncovering a couple of typographic errors in the equations, in particular, I discovered the error in Dick's use of the Dirac Delta function some months before Alex spotted the same error in his cursory reading.

At this point, I am satisfied that Dick's work is not only correct, but profound. I regret that I am not in a position to certify that position with stronger credentials.

I also regret that someone with sufficient credentials has not been interested, so far, in reviewing the work. In this regard, I sincerely appreciate the appeal you made in your post. I hope it snags at least one qualified individual.

Warm regards,

Paul

• I have just got to see this infamous paper... - smartguy - October 21, 2001 - 02:49 UTC
  • Take a look - pmartin - October 21, 2001 - 06:05 UTC
• How do you know something is correct and profound.. - bruce - October 21, 2001 - 04:15 UTC
  • I don't. - pmartin - October 21, 2001 - 06:04 UTC
    • Well... - harvey1 - October 21, 2001 - 15:42 UTC
      • Yes, well... - pmartin - October 21, 2001 - 17:55 UTC
• Where is Alexander the Great on this? - luis_hamburgh - October 21, 2001 - 20:03 UTC
  • Quit being an idiot... - bruce - October 21, 2001 - 21:41 UTC
    • What? - pmartin - October 22, 2001 - 03:17 UTC
      • No.. - bruce - October 22, 2001 - 03:48 UTC
        • Thanks for the clarification, Bruce. - pmartin - October 22, 2001 - 16:31 UTC
          • So.. - bruce - October 22, 2001 - 20:08 UTC
            • Okay... - pmartin - October 22, 2001 - 22:40 UTC
              • Thorne says... - bruce - October 22, 2001 - 23:30 UTC
                • Thank you, Bruce - pmartin - October 22, 2001 - 23:49 UTC
                  • Thats nonsense.. - bruce - October 23, 2001 - 00:33 UTC
                    • I would love to!!! - doctordick - October 23, 2001 - 14:28 UTC
                      • No, you aren't - thom_cl - October 23, 2001 - 19:02 UTC
                        • Oh, poor boy! - doctordick - October 23, 2001 - 20:45 UTC
                          • You can't get published because your.. - bruce - October 24, 2001 - 02:54 UTC
                            • Probably because I really don't care! - doctordick - October 24, 2001 - 13:26 UTC
                              • Stupid like Emmanuel Kant was stupid - yanniru - October 24, 2001 - 15:13 UTC
                              • Lightweight - bruce - October 25, 2001 - 20:03 UTC
                                • I think Bruce said he is not a physicist - carefuluniverse - April 21, 2002 - 02:21 UTC
                      • LOL - bruce - October 24, 2001 - 02:52 UTC
                  • Thats nonsense.. - bruce - October 23, 2001 - 00:53 UTC
                    • That's understood - pmartin - October 23, 2001 - 04:00 UTC
        • Idiotic response - luis_hamburgh - October 22, 2001 - 22:23 UTC
  • He's been there; done that - pmartin - October 22, 2001 - 03:23 UTC
    • Alex... - bruce - October 22, 2001 - 03:51 UTC