Astronomy Discussion Forums | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Sorry For The Knucklehead..
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Bruce on November 3, 2002 01:11:27 UTC |
its just hard for me to think somebody with your education needs to preface his work with such ignorant comments. Its hard to believe you are completely ignorant to what the purpose of a physics model is and the freedom the creator of the model has when defining the models parameters. My conclusion is you never REALLY wanted ANYBODY to read your paper. You obviously can't use your model to make any prediction related to the physics experiments I mentioned to you in the past, even though you claim pretty much all of modern physics can be derived from your model. Probably because those claims are specious. Sorry about the knucklehead comment. |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |