Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Black Holes

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by VANDEBROEK M/">VANDEBROEK M on August 14, 1998 12:37:23 UTC

I have been reading your definition of black holes, assuming a singularity, so that light can't move away from a black hole. But Prof Hawking introduced the idea of imaginary time, and leaved the principle of the singularity. Because of this there must be another explanation why we can't see the mass that represents a black hole. Until now there is no proof that nothing is moving quicker than c, so maybe a black hole is in that case?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins