Blackholes2 Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Black Holes
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by VANDEBROEK M/">VANDEBROEK M on August 14, 1998 12:37:23 UTC |
I have been reading your definition of black holes, assuming a singularity, so that light can't move away from a black hole. But Prof Hawking introduced the idea of imaginary time, and leaved the principle of the singularity. Because of this there must be another explanation why we can't see the mass that represents a black hole. Until now there is no proof that nothing is moving quicker than c, so maybe a black hole is in that case? |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |