Blackholes2 Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Clarification
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Astrophysicist on August 17, 1998 09:51:20 UTC |
I'm sorry, but I'm afraid I don't understand how imaginary time relates to a mass moving faster than light. Black holes are thought to be the collapsed remnants of gigantic stars, so they should remain relatively immobile (at least, with no more movement than the star it was previously had). But I don't really know anything about Hawking's theories on imaginary time. Perhaps if you could give me a source to look it up in? |
|
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |