Blackholes2 Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Joseph To Alexander
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Joseph Roser on March 23, 2001 16:37:53 UTC |
Thank you for the reply. My only problem in trying to balance the books energy wise is that I do not know what account to debit for the energy derived from the gravitational potential. An energy difference between two points in a gravity field would not seem to be able to be transported intact anywhere in the universe without leaving something depleted by that much energy behind. Yet the gravitating body undergoes no change if that piece of energy is removed so the gravity field should have suffered no loss of strength. I am referring here to the blueshift portion of a neutrino's kinetic energy gained from the gravitational potential, not to relativistic mass inflation. |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |