Blackholes2 Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Re: Inversely Proportional, Not Proportional.
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Zephram Cochrane on February 5, 2000 13:54:55 UTC |
: sound absurd? : it should. : How does One arrive that a quantum event is plausible when the time : interval is 0, and thus the probability and uncertainty of such an event : occuring is 0? : It always has amazed me that the popular speculation of scientists, : when confronted with BB causalty, systematically assume BB cosmology : a result of a "quantum fluctuation". : Do we not forget that the uncertainty of quantum mechanics is directly : proportional to the time interval allowed for the event; thus arriving : at a probability of such an event occuring? : In short... No time = 0 probability. ZC: DE ~ h/DT Even if the time interval between events went to zero, this would imply that the energy available for the production of matter in the universe diverged, not that the probability of the occurrence went to zero.
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |