![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
Re: Prove Your Theory Rather Than Einsteins
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by David W. Anderson on January 21, 2000 02:53:22 UTC |
TJ: WHATS REQUIRED HERE IS YOUR POINT OF VIEW AND NOBODY ELSE. : THIS SPECIFICALLY FOR MATHMANS,ZEPHRANE COCHRANE,YELMALIOS,ZEONS Etc : Wayne: TJ, I can understand your position, but a theory is by definition unproven. That is why its called a theory. E=mc2 for example could be described as a LAW rather than a theory. We have the nuclear devices that pretty much prove it. I have VERY strong differences of opinion with some of the people you list, but I can not prove my theory any more than they can. Relativity is a theory, but certain parts of it are very strong. That is why it has held up so well to so much experiment and math. Black holes are a prediction that springs from the CURRENT UNDERSTANDING of the theory. Zephrem and many others think warping spacetime will prove true and confirm the existance of singularities. I believe they are wrong and that space and light should be considered mathematically one and the same. This, along with a quantum theory for gravity will spell the end of one theory or the other. But that's just my theory. Keep searching for the TRUTH.
|
|
Additional Information |
---|
![]() |
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |