Blackholes2 Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Re: Black Holes And Cosmology
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by yanniru/">yanniru on May 26, 1999 12:20:21 UTC |
: real quick cuz i'm off to bed, but I had to respond : cuz I am just as intrigued by this phenomenon as : you seem to be... : All I will mention are some thoughts; due to time : limitations... : remember that there is ideally no "area" beyond : an EH. we only use the term to idealize the blackholes : nature. In reality the EH is the singularity. Because : at THE event horizon would be a state of spacetime infalling : AT the speed of light (which is impossible). : Likewise, as one fell into a blackhole because of : exponential time dilation, the blackhole would likely : exponentially radiate its mass away with respect : to how far you get from the "EH". Thus, the blackhole : would "approach" extinction before you could ever : "ideally reach" the singularity/EH. : I may have ssounded half cracked, but i'm tired and : late to bed! wife calls!! : ) : Godbless : -Nate Dear Nate: Are you saying that the solution for black holes from General Relativity is incorrect for it clearly has a solution within the event horizon? |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |