1. Magbetic fields are blocked by conductors, such as coils used to shield equipment

2. Opposite polarizations do interfere, but that is not considered an anti-particle by physicists.

Victor M. Urbina's model has been proposed by others who he has not referenced, notably Richard Richardson. He reasoning for why such a two charge model is needed is howevr quite erroneous. I will explain in detail if you wish.

EM waves and photons are dual. Gravitons and gravitational waves are dual. Particles of different spin number cannot be dual to each other.

3. There are standard ways to measure the many forms of energy and the one form of gravity.

• 1.2.3. reply - mgutchess - January 14, 2003 - 22:55 UTC
  • Electrons can create or absorb - yaniru - January 15, 2003 - 02:16 UTC
    • magnetic shielding - mgutchess - January 15, 2003 - 03:17 UTC
      • It's in your link - yaniru - January 15, 2003 - 17:14 UTC
        • I read that - mgutchess - January 15, 2003 - 18:42 UTC
          • ***The graviton is the opposite of a photon. *** - yaniru - January 20, 2003 - 16:07 UTC
            • OKAY - mgutchess - January 21, 2003 - 03:42 UTC
              • good science (QED) - yaniru - January 21, 2003 - 04:03 UTC
                • Math - mgutchess - January 22, 2003 - 04:16 UTC
                  • we can not observe how gravity works via relativity's warped spa - yaniru - January 22, 2003 - 12:36 UTC
                  • Apparently... - bruce - January 23, 2003 - 10:40 UTC
                  • Is math a region of logic? Perhaps you intend to say... - quiet - January 23, 2003 - 18:15 UTC
• Your reply is inadequate - m3pers2 - January 15, 2003 - 05:46 UTC
  • Not making sense? - mgutchess - January 15, 2003 - 12:47 UTC
    • Sorry - m3pers2 - January 18, 2003 - 02:56 UTC
      • Please...you were right - carefuluniverse - January 18, 2003 - 23:07 UTC
      • Okay man, - mgutchess - January 19, 2003 - 14:58 UTC
        • Gravity Wave? - m3pers2 - January 19, 2003 - 21:47 UTC
          • I cannot follow your physics - yaniru - January 20, 2003 - 16:23 UTC
            • Physics: Reply - m3pers2 - January 21, 2003 - 01:54 UTC
              • What is the acceleration of gravity ? - yaniru - January 21, 2003 - 04:07 UTC
                • Acceleration of Gravity - m3pers2 - January 21, 2003 - 04:52 UTC
                  • Two different distances and masses - yaniru - January 21, 2003 - 12:26 UTC
                    • One Distance Cubed - m3pers2 - January 25, 2003 - 17:32 UTC
                      • Of course the distance that is changing is the distance between - yaniru - January 25, 2003 - 19:21 UTC
                        • I expect an apology - m3pers2 - January 25, 2003 - 22:03 UTC
                          • You contradicted your self - yaniru - January 26, 2003 - 04:27 UTC
                            • Yanniru should apologize - quiet - January 28, 2003 - 16:56 UTC
                            • It does stand up. - m3pers2 - February 1, 2003 - 05:35 UTC
                              • Greater detail - yaniru - February 2, 2003 - 00:23 UTC
                                • Details - m3pers2 - February 11, 2003 - 05:54 UTC
                                  • That volume is not the volume of mass a or b. - yaniru - February 11, 2003 - 13:26 UTC
  • The universe is really not that complicated, and I resent you tr - yaniru - January 20, 2003 - 17:01 UTC
    • Simple Universe - m3pers2 - January 26, 2003 - 00:05 UTC
      • I believe I know exactly what caused this misunderstanding. - yaniru - January 26, 2003 - 04:14 UTC