Galaxy distribution charts, by definition, show the center in a non-expanding, rotating universe.

But there is a problem alright. It is with differential velocities measurement in a rotating universe, as I have described on my website.

If one is sitting on a rotating platform, one cannot use Doppler to detect the velocity of anything else on the same platform. So by this, it is not possible to discern the rotation velocity of the universe.

But once the total distribution pattern of the galaxies is reasonably well known, then it may be possible to calculate what it must be using masses and distances. Of course I must leave that to the astronomers and mathematicians.

Prediction: And I say the galaxies will follow an Orbital Velocity Distribution Curve essentially identical to the stars in a spiral galaxy. That is; the CURVE will be the same, not the actual velocities values. And the non-Newtonian, non-General Relativity effect will be there, as JR Redbourne's Permanent Gravity Effect.

• Galaxy distribution charts, by definition, show the center in a - yaniru - November 18, 2002 - 18:01 UTC
  • Those charts must estimate distances b4 a center can be located - quiet - November 18, 2002 - 21:51 UTC
  • Exactly - cosmotiger - November 18, 2002 - 23:25 UTC
    • Not - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 00:24 UTC
      • The pattern will show universe center - rayredbourne - November 19, 2002 - 01:24 UTC
        • Not really... - cosmotiger - November 19, 2002 - 03:43 UTC
          • The way it goes... - bruce - November 19, 2002 - 04:57 UTC
            • BTW-Mike... - bruce - November 19, 2002 - 04:58 UTC
              • Mike got an A in physics in 1977, A in Algebra, A in Geology - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 05:02 UTC
                • Mike is a liar... - bruce - November 19, 2002 - 05:05 UTC
                  • bruce is mistaken about both his assertions - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 05:55 UTC
                  • Ruquist is posing as bruce and is damned by God - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 05:56 UTC
                    • Actually Mike.. - bruce - November 19, 2002 - 06:05 UTC
                      • BTW Mike... - bruce - November 19, 2002 - 06:08 UTC
                        • What a waste you are.... I deny you invented Brilliant Pebbles - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 06:22 UTC
                          • Actually Mike Pearson... - bruce - November 19, 2002 - 06:40 UTC
                            • If only you had been one of them, the good ones would return - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 06:42 UTC
                              • Mike Pearson is delusional... - bruce - November 19, 2002 - 06:50 UTC
                                • I am enjoying the responses - yaniru - November 19, 2002 - 13:55 UTC
                                  • Greg Canavan invented Brilliant Pebbles - yaniru - November 19, 2002 - 19:14 UTC
                                    • f.o.a.d.? - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 19:28 UTC
                                • Bruce is Ruquist - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 18:16 UTC
                                • Had I been in error, it would have sufficed for one to show how - quiet - November 20, 2002 - 04:41 UTC
                        • And technically, Fumunda Cheese is really a kind of Jam - quiet - November 20, 2002 - 05:07 UTC
                      • What do you care what other people think? - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 06:21 UTC
            • My understanding... - rayredbourne - November 20, 2002 - 10:05 UTC
            • Bruce... - rayredbourne - November 20, 2002 - 10:21 UTC
          • I has seen it. I dun seen the pixure! - quiet - November 19, 2002 - 04:59 UTC
          • A web? - rayredbourne - November 20, 2002 - 09:59 UTC
            • Galaxy distribution pages and images - quiet - November 20, 2002 - 19:52 UTC
            • More or less... - cosmotiger - November 20, 2002 - 21:22 UTC