Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Myth Of Number

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alan on December 2, 2001 07:10:08 UTC

Here's a thought: the way mathematicians use numbers is fantasy.

Example: mathematicians claim 1 + 1 = 2.

'= (equals)'? Impossible in absolute terms. They can only mean that 1 and another 1 have something in common; and that common feature, there are two of.

But 1 + 1 actually means 'this 1' plus 'that 1'.
If it didn't, there would be no difference between the 1's; such that you couldn't even talk of another 1. If one 1 is absolutely the same as the other 1; there is in fact only one 1.

So to have 1 plus 1; you must be really talking about different 1s. So everyday math is a fantasy of imaginary numbers and generalisations.

Ironically; the numbers that mathematicians call "imaginary" are the REAL ONES.

Why? Because 'i' incorporates within it the fact that each '1' IS DIFFERENT. The square root of -1 represents a vector which 'multiplied by itself' gives a vector of one unit in a 'negative' direction. "Multiplied by ITSELF"? Impossible: can only multiply 'this' by 'that'. Actually there is a superposition of vector operations: the pattern that results gives you -1.

If you look closely at vector multiplication; you find there is a difference in the two vectors and their application relative to each other.
Now any difference at all, is as good as saying well 'this' by 'that' gives -1; and you could just call 'this' '+' and 'that '-' and you have the regular result say -1 times 1 = -1.
Relativity, superposition, and quantum jumping are all tied up in this whole business, it seems.

Nature reads its book by complex numbers, they say at Of course; because with complex numbers you get nature's numbers ('i') mixed with man's pattern-recognition (natural numbers etc.), thus gives you complex numbers.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins