Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Don't Know About The Reduced Circumference..

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bruce on February 22, 2001 01:41:01 UTC

The far away observer measures the distance to the event horizon to be infinite
so when r=2M the expression results in an infinity.
At the same time the far away observer can take the integral of that expression and show that the distance is actually finite
=[r1/2(r-2M)1/2+2M ln{r1/2+(r-2M)1/2}]r2,r1
The far away observer also measures the velocity of the freely falling object to -> 0 as the object approaches r=2M (event horizon) and this is even true for light
dr/dt=-((1-2M/r)(2M/r)1/2 [from rest at infinity]
dr/dt=-(1-2M/r) [light]
The local shell observer very close to r=2M measures the freely falling object to -> c as it crosses the event horizon
also for light
Now to get to what you are talking about
the far away observer measures the total energy in Schwarzchild geometry to decrease with decreasing r-coordinate for the freely falling object.
E/m=(1-2M/r)dt/dt and as r->2M the total energy -> 0. This is an amazing result. So where is this energy conserved as it grows smaller with decreasing r-coordinate? It is conserved in the gravitational field. So as you said all the gravitational energy for the black hole is in the field outside the event horizon with respect to the far away observer who is the GR bookkeeper. This is only one perspective. I think the local explanation requires a quantum solution. Especially if we are talking about gravitons. There is nothing in physics which precludes virtual gravitons from tunneling the horizon with respect to limits set by the uncertainty relationship for energy and time. This means that within this relationship they can exceed c during the tunnel. What do you think about this?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins