Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: RE: RE: RE: The 4th Dimention

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by rich on September 2, 2000 02:15:31 UTC

If we can graph x dimensions that all share a common point, which is zero, then why do we dismiss the study of what graphically is the center of the universe and all of its dimensions?
I know that we do not like the answers that we get; but are we caught in the proverbial forest and trees syndrom? Lots of interesting things become possible if in-fact zero is a valid concept. For example, if we divide by zero, then we can cross any dimension or set of dimensions conceptually instantaneously. Perhaps we can even explain where the other end of a black hole is and how to get there.

In any case, it is inconcievable to me that the concept of zero is so quickly dimissed and yet so important in physics, conceptual mathamatics and so many other disiplines.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins