RE: RE: RE: RE: The 4th Dimention - an Astronomy Net Blackholes Forum Message

Blackholes Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes I \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

RE: RE: RE: RE: The 4th Dimention

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by rich on September 2, 2000 02:15:31 UTC

If we can graph x dimensions that all share a common point, which is zero, then why do we dismiss the study of what graphically is the center of the universe and all of its dimensions?
I know that we do not like the answers that we get; but are we caught in the proverbial forest and trees syndrom? Lots of interesting things become possible if in-fact zero is a valid concept. For example, if we divide by zero, then we can cross any dimension or set of dimensions conceptually instantaneously. Perhaps we can even explain where the other end of a black hole is and how to get there.

In any case, it is inconcievable to me that the concept of zero is so quickly dimissed and yet so important in physics, conceptual mathamatics and so many other disiplines.

Follow Ups:

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The 4th Dimention - horace - September 5, 2000 - 23:19 UTC
- RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The 4th Dimention - Vik - September 6, 2000 - 02:15 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins